Selection of Ayurvedic Formulations for the Management of Amlapitta (Functional Dyspepsia) Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: A Modified RAND/UCLA Consensus Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70066/jahm.v14i3.2537Keywords:
Amlapitta, Drug Selection, Functional Dyspepsia, RAND/UCLA AppropriatenessAbstract
Background: Functional dyspepsia is a highly prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by heterogeneous symptom presentation; there is limited consensus on the optimal approach for long-term management. Classical Ayurveda describes such a condition as Amlapitta and recommends multiple formulations for management based on the predominant dosha. Lack of standardized, transparent criteria in order to select specific formulations for clinical research is a major lacuna in this context. RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method provides a structured framework for integrating available evidence with expert clinical judgment in such scenarios. Objective: To identify classical Ayurveda formulations considered appropriate for management of Amlapitta based on dosha specific presentations using a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to inform future clinical research. Methods: A structured Modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Consensus was conducted. Evidence was synthesized from classical Ayurvedic texts and biomedical literature. A multidisciplinary expert panel of 9 experts independently rated the appropriateness of shortlisted formulations for dosha-based presentations of Amlapitta on a 9-point scale. Ratings were carried out over 2 rounds with discussion intervening between the rounds. Agreement, disagreement, and final appropriateness classifications were arrived at by standard RAND criteria, including median scores, inter-percentile ranges, and disagreement parameters. Results: 6 Ayurvedic formulations were evaluated across 3 dosha specific types of Amlapitta: Vataja, Kaphaja and Vatakaphaja. After 2 rounds of consensus, 3 combinations were classified as appropriate, 7 as uncertain while none as inappropriate. Kamadugha Rasa, Leelavilasa Rasa and Shankha Vati were rated appropriate for Vataja, Kaphaja and Vatakaphaja Amlapitta respectively, each signifying strong agreement among panelists (DI <1). Conclusion: RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method application in the selection of formulations for Amlapitta in the current study signifies how structured expert judgement can bridge classical Ayurvedic knowledge and contemporary research standards. Implications of this approach can strengthen methodological rigor, improve standardization, and enhance the credibility of future Ayurvedic clinical trials.
References
Shankar H. Clinical prevalence and current treatment standards for GERD and dyspepsia, and perception of effectiveness and safety of itopride in Indian patients: a physician survey. Journal of Advanced Scientific Research.2023;14:25–34. Available from: https://www.sciensage.info/jasr/?page_id=4070
Francis P, Zavala SR. Functional dyspepsia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan– [updated 2024 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554563/
Yadav B, Mahajan B, Dubey N, Panda AK, Rao BC, Singhal R, et al. Traditional Ayurveda medicines for the management of Amlapitta (functional dyspepsia): a study protocol for a prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical trial. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2023;14(4):100654. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100654
Sastri S, editor. Vidyotini Hindi Commentary on Madhava Nidana of Madhavakara. Amlapitta Nidana, chapter 51, verse no.7–10. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Prakashan; 2010;172.
Tripathi B, editor. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha with Charaka Chandrika Hindi Commentary. Chikitsasthana, Grahani Chikitsa Adhyaya, chapter 15, verse no.47. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Surbharati Prakashan; 2019;559.
Ashwathykutty V, Payyappallimana U, Narayanan VR. Addressing clinical practice variability in Ayurveda: An urgent need for developing clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2025 Sep–Oct;16(5):101201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2025.101201
World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. ISBN: 9789241515436. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/312342
World Health Organization. WHO traditional medicine strategy 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/10665/92455/1/9789241506090_eng.pdf
Ministry of AYUSH. Ayurvedic Standard Treatment Guidelines. 1st ed. Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India; 2017. Available from: https://namayush.gov.in/sites/all/themes/webcms/images/org_str/ASTG_Book.pdf. Accessed on 13 February 2026.
Chauhan A, Semwal DK, Mishra SP, Semwal RB. Ayurvedic research and methodology: Present status and future strategies. Ayu. 2015;36(4):364–369. doi:10.4103/0974-8520.190699. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27833362/
RAND Corporation. Appropriateness Method. Available from: https://www.rand.org/health/surveys/appropriateness.html. Accessed on December 30, 2025.
Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Abel G, et al. Workstream 4: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. In: Policies and strategies to retain and support the return of experienced GPs in direct patient care: the ReGROUP mixed-methods study. NIHR Journals Library; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539926/. Accessed on December 30, 2025.
Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. RAND Corporation; 2001. Report No.: MR-1269. Available from: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2011/MR1269.pdf. Accessed on December 30, 2025.
Charles KR, Hall L, Ullman AJ, Schults JA. Methodology minute: Utilizing the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method to develop guidelines for infection prevention. American Journal of Infection Control. 2022;50(3):345–348. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.012
Mishra SN, editor. Bhaishajya Ratnavali of Govind Das Sen with Siddhiprada Hindi Commentary. Amlapitta Rogadhikara, chapter 56, verse no.25–29. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Surbharati Prakashan; 2005;922.
Acharya YT, editor. Rasa Yoga Sagara. 2nd edition. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2004. Kamadugha Vati;103.
Sharma S, editor. Rasa Tarangini. 11th edition. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass; 2017. Chapter 22, Shankha Vati Yoga;498.
Nair D, Gaonkar S, Lakshmi KNC. Utility of Rasadravyas in Panchakarma. Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM). 2019;7(2):66. Available from: https://jahm.co.in/index.php/jahm/article/download/62/36/152. Accessed on January 4, 2026.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 R Sunil Kumar Devaki, Vrushali, Rajimunnisa B S, Prasad B
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM) the right of first publication. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license, which permits non-commercial sharing, use, distribution, and adaptation with proper attribution and the same license terms.
JAHM ensures free, irrevocable, worldwide access to its content. Users may copy, distribute, display, and share published works for non-commercial purposes with appropriate credit to the author(s) and the journal. Limited printed copies for personal, non-commercial use are allowed under the same license.
If a submission is not accepted for publication, the author(s) will be notified.
By submitting, authors confirm that the work is original, that all listed authors have contributed and approved it, and that it does not infringe any third-party rights or duplicate work submitted elsewhere.
